What is it with Route 5 and angry drivers?


Over the last week, there was another round of fun letters to the editor in the Virginia Gazette:

It is annoying, as well as a safety hazard, for bicyclists to ride along Route 5 when taxpayers spent $1 million per mile to have a bike path constructed. Cannot James City have an ordinance that bicycling on Route 5 is prohibited on all sections where there is a parallel bike path?

Yesterday, there was this response:

In response to the person complaining about bicyclists along Route 5, I’m sorry to have offended you. I didn’t vote for the bike path boondoggle, so please don’t crucify me for not using it. I am a competitive cyclist and find that the folks using the bike path don’t pay attention to what is going on in front or behind them. Also, the path is narrow, and riding at speed along it would create high risk. Thus I ride Route 5, which does have enough room for both cyclists and road vehicles, at least for folks who are competent at driving. I have a right to use the road, so please don’t yell out your car window at me anymore. As with many of the topics in the Last Word, aren’t there better things to do with your time?

This wasn’t me, but I have a good idea as to who it is and I completely agree with their statement.  While I haven’t been on Route 5/John Tyler in awhile, I have received plenty of grief from drivers in that area.  It’s as if the bike path serves only to make them angrier.

, ,

  1. No comments yet.
(will not be published)